 |

Round One: System
Features
(the Palm OS vs. Pocket PC)
System features are, undoubtedly, the
most difficult to compare. While the Pocket PC hardware has 2-4 times
the amount of memory available, Pocket PC applications and data often
require 2-4 times as much space. The same can be said for processor
speed, where a device that screams at 206 MHz on the Pocket PC may very
well yield the same performance as the 20 MHz Palm IIIc (Editor's Note:
As Palm applications become more color-dependant, we feel the 20mhz
processor might prove to be a weak point). Thankfully, not all system
comparisons are that difficult to make.
First, the Palm Pilot edges out the
Pocket PC in battery life, since one of the Pocket PC devices yields
only 6 hours of power. Our staff loves the Pilot's automated infrared
receive capability and the smooth way it handles incoming IR data (as
evidenced in Palm's "train meeting" commercial). At press
time, we were able to find much lower street prices for the Color Palm
Pilot than any of the Pocket PCs. To be fair, Pocket PCs have just
recently gone on sale, so we expect their prices will drop as soon as
the initial rush for devices is over. But this is important for people
interested in an immediate purchase. Finally, the Pocket PC offers
absolutely no connection to the Macintosh platform, making the choice in
the matter a no-brainer if you're an Apple Computer household.
The area that the Pocket PC shines in is
multimedia. With thousands of colors, versus the Palm's 256 and more
than three times the pixel resolution, displaying photos and web pages
is far more impressive on the Pocket PC. Also, the Compaq iPAQ is the
only device in our tests that has a screen with full readability in
broad daylight. In addition, the Pocket PC has the benefit of an
entire suite of multi-media applications; sporting an audio book reader,
MP3 player and the invaluable voice recorder. The Pocket PC also
"one ups" the Pilot in data entry methods with single stroke (graffiti),
mini-keyboard and full handwriting recognition as
well connection options (to the desktop) offering serial, IR and USB.
Speaking of the computer connection, the Pocket PC synchronizes nearly 6
times faster than the Pilot and offers automated (no-button)
synchronization.
It's nearly too close to call in this
category, so let's move on to a comparison of the built-in applications.
|
Head-to-Head Feature
Comparison: Operating System
|
Palm OS |
Pocket PC |
| Applications |
Address Book
Calculator
Calendar
Expense tracking
Games
Mail
Security
Memo pad
To-do list |
Address Book
Calculator
Calendar
Expense tracking
Games
Mail
Security
Memo pad
To-do list
eBook reader
Internet Explorer
MP3 player
Voice recorder
Street Maps |
| Battery Power*
(color units) |
11-12 hours |
6-12 hours |
| On-system Character Input Methods |
2 |
3 |
| Color Levels |
256 |
4,096-65,000 |
| Connection
Options |
COMM, IR |
COMM, IR, USB |
| Cost (MSRP) |
$499 |
$499-$599 |
| Infrared:
Automated Receive |
Yes |
No |
| Memory |
8MB |
16MB-32MB |
| Pixel Resolution |
160x160 |
320x240 |
| Processor |
20 MHz |
133-206 MHz |
| Synchronization: Automated |
No |
Yes |
| Synchronization: Speed* |
115,200 kpbs |
~690,000 kbps |
|
* These statistics are from the manufacturer's
information, not our testing environment. Please note that individual user
results may vary.
Published: 6/1/00
About
SemperAptus.com | Legal Statement | Privacy
Statement
© Copyright
2000-2005, SemperAptus . All rights reserved.
Please refer all comments to
webmaster@semperaptus.com
|